What if senators represented people by income or race, not by state? - washingtonpost.com→

yaldabaoth:

ericrobertsswagger:

champagnecandy:

amandaw:

abbyjean:

But what if the 100-member Senate were designed to mirror the overall U.S. population — and were based on statistics rather than state lines? Imagine a chamber in which senators were elected by different income brackets — with two senators representing the poorest 2 percent of the electorate, two senators representing the richest 2 percent and so on. Based on Census Bureau data, five senators would represent Americans earning between $100,000 and $1 million individually per year, with a single senator working on behalf of the millionaires (technically, it would be two-tenths of a senator). Eight senators would represent Americans with no income. Sixteen would represent Americans who make less than $10,000 a year, an amount well below the federal poverty line for families. The bulk of the senators would work on behalf of the middle class, with 34 representing Americans making $30,000 to $80,000 per year.

You make my heart flutter.

somebody once introduced me to the phrase “vulgar marxism.”

i kid, this is pretty much awesome.

Fascinating.

A+++ would read again